LLMQuant Newsletter

LLMQuant Newsletter

Why RAG Still Gets Facts Wrong and How TruthfulRAG Fixes It

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Conflict Resolution in Large Language Models

LLMQuant's avatar
LLMQuant
Nov 22, 2025
∙ Paid

Retrieval-Augmented Generation has quickly become one of the most influential ideas in modern AI. As large language models continue to grow while their parametric knowledge becomes stale, RAG offers an elegant patch: let the model retrieve new information from external sources and combine it with its learned internal representations. In theory, this hybrid structure should produce accurate, up-to-date, and context-aware answers. In practice, RAG systems still hallucinate, contradict themselves, and often fail when retrieved information clashes with what the model already believes. These failures point to a deeper challenge that traditional retrieval systems overlook. When external evidence conflicts with the model’s internal memories, which does the model trust?

A new research paper titled TruthfulRAG introduces a compelling answer to this question by reframing the problem itself: conflict resolution should operate at the factual level, not at the token or semantic level. Instead of simply injecting text snippets into the model context or adjusting decoding probabilities, TruthfulRAG proposes that RAG systems should reason over structured knowledge graphs. By converting retrieved information into triples, retrieving graph paths aligned with the query, and using entropy-based filtering to detect conflicting reasoning chains, the framework offers a systematic way to identify disagreement and guide the model toward accurate information. The result is a more faithful reasoning process, one that overcomes the inherent tension between static internal knowledge and dynamic external evidence.

This article explains the problem of knowledge conflict in modern RAG systems, walks through the architecture of TruthfulRAG, and explores why this approach outperforms existing techniques across multiple benchmark datasets. It also reflects on what this means for the future of retrieval-centric AI systems.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to LLMQuant Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 LLMQuant
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture